- dansmath > ask
dan > questions
and answers page
-







-
-
- dan's questions and answers page
- I have expanded this section;
check out the new questions, or ask
your own!
- Also you might want to look
at some reader comments.
-
- Basic Skills Questions (or go to basic lessons)
- B1 - Writing a googolplex
- B2 - Fraction woes
-
- Number Theory Questions
- N1 - Factor question
- Algebra Questions (or go to algebra lessons)
- A1 - I need your
help fast
- A2 - The 'two trains'
problem
- A3 - Miminizing a
weird function
-
- Trig Questions (or go to trig lessons)
- T1 - Sine, Cosine,
Tangent
-
- Calculus Questions (or go to calculus lessons)
- C1 - Graphs of functions
and derivatives
-
- Miscellaneous Questions (or go to 'other' lessons)
- M1 - Profit curve
for econ?
- M2 - Too big for
calculator!
- M3 - Scarecrow was
not a wizard
- M4 - Good grapefruit
prediction
- M5 - The Speed Of
Dark?
-
-
- Basic Skills Questions
-
- Question B1 - Writing
a googolplex [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan - Our math professor
at U of Louisville posed this question:
- If one million zeroes
can be written on the front and back of a sheet of
- paper, how many sheets
of paper are necessary for a googol of zeros?
We have to come up with answer (which was not a problem - it's 10 to
- the 94th power sheets of
paper) and we have to be able to explain the
- problem and solution to
a 12-year old. How do you explain such a
- large number to someone
- what can you relate it to? - Karen
-
- Hi Karen -- Thanks for writing -- interesting question.
A googol is 10^100 and a 1 with
- a googol zeroes after it is called
a 'googolplex.'
-
- I thought maybe you could relate the
thickness of the paper (a ream of paper, 500 sheets, is
around 2" so each sheet is about .004" thick) and a
large distance, say from the earth to the
moon (around 240,000 miles). I'll let you figure out how the
number of sheets of paper
from here to the moon compares with 10^94 (still nowhere close?),
so talk about how many
trillions of stacks of paper like that you'd need?
-
- Another aspect is time: if you
wrote 1 number per second (or a printer spit out one sheet
per min), how many centuries would it take if all 6 billion people
wrote (or had printers)?
By the way, 1 million seconds = 12 days and 1 billion sec = 31
years, approx!
-
- Ask the 12-yr-old how far away they've
traveled (say New York, 3000 miles), then maybe
relate the earth-moon distance to that (80 times as far). --
Hope this helps!
- Meanwhile don't waste paper writing
out a googolplex in base 10. ;-}
- -- Dan the Math Man -- www.dansmath.com
-
- Question B2 - Fraction
Woes [ top
of page ]
- Hello Dave, I am a 7th
grader and having a hard time with fractions.
- Could you point me in
the direction of a helpful site? Thanks, Will
(Coming to you from Colorful Colorado, home of the Awesome Avalanche!!!)
-
- Hi Will... (My
name's Dan but I'll answer to Dave...)
- I was going to point you to my site, www.dansmath.com
, but you're right, I don't
have much currently there on fractions. I will give you some
pointers but I would
suggest www.google.com --
type in 'Fraction math help' and I swear it will give
you some excellent active choices. Look for some on-line quizzes
as well.
- Here's one I just found: www.mathleague.com/help/fractions/fractions.htm
- You can also go to 'expert sites' such as www.askme.com and look for message
items or ask questions there. I'll be happy to answer specific
questions or problems
for you too.
-
- As for fractions themselves: here's a quick review: The top
is the 'numerator', and the
- bottom is the 'denominator'; in 5/7 the 5 is the numerator
and the 7 is the denominator.
-
- Fractions with the same denominator can easily be added or
subtracted: keep the same
denominator and add or subtract the numerators. 5/7
+ 3/7 = (5 + 3)/7 = 8/7 or 1 1/7.
-
- Fractions can be converted or reduced: 4/6
= 2/3 (divide top & bottom by 2),
or 5/7 = 15/21 (multiply
top & bottom by 3).
- Fractions with different denoms have to be converted to a
common denom (LCM)
2/5 + 1/3 = 6/15 + 5/15 = 11/15
, etc.
- Multiplying two fractions: multiply tops and bottoms separately:
2/3 * 5/8 = (2*5)/(3*8) = 10/24 = 5/12.
- Dividing two fractions: iinvert the second fraction and then
multiply:
(4/9) / (3/7) = (4/9) * (7/3) = 28/27 or
1 1/27.
- Then there's the whole connection with fractions and decimals
and percents...
-
- --Dan the Math Man
-
-
- Number Theory Questions
-
- Question N1 - A Factor
Question [
top of page ]
-
- Dan, Hello! My name is
Brandon, I am a college student in KY. I was
- asked a question the other
day, that has stumped me. The question was...
- what is the smallest number
possible with exactly 100 factors? This
- question may seem easy
to you, but it was kicking my butt. If you could
- help and email me back
I would really appreciate it. Thanks again..
- Hey Brandon. You definitely askedd the right person!
That's not a simple question so
- give your kicked butt a rest. The idea is to use the prime
factoriz'n and work with the
exponents alone to find the number of divisors.
-
- See my lessons page
on supercomposites, also
called highly composite or versatile numbers.
- For example 48 = 2^4 * 3^1 and
if we make a list of all divisors of 48:
- multiples of 3 in 2nd row; others in top row:
1 2 4 8 16
3 6 12 24 48
there are 5 columns of 2, making 10 divisors, and notice the
exponents are 4 and 1 ;
- you add 1 to each and multiply : d(48)
= (4+1)(1+1) = 5*2 = 10.
-
- The link for my page is: http://www.dansmath.com/lessons/suprcomp.html
read about using small primes and with larger exponents.
- Now if you want 100 divisors, figure out how to produce100
as a product of (1+exps) :
way: expons prime fac'z'n number (you calc
it)
10*10 9 , 9 2^9 * 3^9
10*5*2 9, 4, 1 2^9 * 3^4 * 5^1
5*5*4 4, 4, 3 2^4 * 3^4 * 5^3
5*5*2*2 4, 4, 1, 1 2^4 3^4 5^1 7^1
- one of these (the smallest, duh) is the butt-kicker you seek.
Hint: it's got 5 digits!
-
- Hope you enjoy my page; this one type of question has held
my interest for years!
- Thanks for letting me tell you about this; no extra charge!
-- Dan the Divisor Man
-
-
-
- Algebra Questions
-
-
- Question A1 - I need your
help fast [
top of page ]
- Hi Dan, I live in Cleveland,
Ohio, and I need your HELP.
- Can you teach me algebra?
I need to learn, and learn fast,
- I am applying for an apprenticeship
program and the
- requirements are algebra.
I really need this opportunity,
- so can you please teach
me? -- Brian
-
- Hi Brian - Algebra is a very important subject ; I call
it the 'gateway to the
technical world'. If this apprentice program is asking you to
know algebra, it
- must mean it's for a job that uses
it and depends on it. This means you can't
- learn it hastily or all at once. If
I wanted to be fluent in speaking Russian, I
- wouldn't be able to do it in a few
days or weeks.
-
- But I do have a lot of lessons on my
website, in all levels; arithmetic, prealgebra,
beginning alg. and on up. Check them out at www.dansmath.com
-->
- math lessons --> Basic Skills. There
are also lots of links on my site or go to
- www.google.com and type 'algebra help.' It's a great way to
find stuff.
-
- I also have a great textbook that could
be used for self-study, check it out at my
site at 'meet dan' then click textbook. If you want to order
the book online, get
- the details ready (Bach/Leitner Prealgebra,
Houghton Mifflin) and then go to
- bookcenter.dvc.edu
and order with a credit card, they ship!
-- DaMathMan
-
- Question A2 - The Two
Trains Problem [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan - two trains
leave stations 100 miles apart.
- "A" train leaves
at 12:00 and "B" train leaves at 1:00.
- when, and at what mile,
will they collide? there will be
- no loss of life. >
mark
i would appreciate any help. big
test on sat am. thank you.
- Hi Mark - I mean mark.
- If we knew the speed of each
train then we could set up distances:
- t = hours past 12:00 ; and the trains
have gone dA and dB:
dA = (speed of A)*(t hours) ; dB = (speed of B)*(t - 1 hours)
because B starts at 1:00, 1 hr later, so 1 hr less time. (both
are d = r t.)
-
- Now our equation is dA + dB = 100 miles,
but we can't solve for t unless
we have some real numbers for those speeds. If you forgot to
include those,
that's where you'd use them; if the speeds weren't given in the
problem
then it wasn't a well-phrased question.
-
- One thing we do know is if A is going
more than 100 mph, the collision
- will occur at B's home station, maybe
with loss of life! -
Dan the Math Man
-
- Question A3 - Miminizing
a Weird Function [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan, How would you
find the minimum of
- y = square root of (x^2
+ 4) + square root of (x^2 - 6 +10).
- Do you have to use calculus?
- Tara
-
- Hi Tara.
- You can use calculus, to minimize y = sqrt(x^2 + 4)
+ sqrt(x^2 - 6x + 10)
by taking the derivative dy/dx and setting it equal to zero.
That looked icky,
but do-able. But you'd prefer a calculus-free approach...
-
- Or you can type the function into your graphing calculator
or some
computer algebra system like Mathematica (see my website),
and try
to spot a min. This one looks like x = 2 gives a smallest
value of about
y = 4.25 or so. Then you could go back to the formula and see
if you
could complete the square to see the min at x = 2:
y - sqrt[x^2 + 4] = sqrt[(x-3)^2 + 1] ; square both sides, simplify,
isolate the square root term, square both sides again, and the
result should
have some sort of factor of (x - 2) if my intuition is right.
-
- I'll let you have fun with the algebra. Hope this helps!
- Dan the Man
-
-
- Trigonometry Questions
-
-
- Question T1 - Sine, Cosine,
Tangent [
top of page ]
- Dan, please help!! I have
been trying to figure out sine, cosine, and tangent
- for about 2 months, and
I can't quite get it. I just don't understand how to
- get to the answer from:
sin/cos/tan(angle)=(side length over side length)
I also do not know how to do sin/cos/tan when you only have one
side length.
- Please, please, please
help!!! ~ Michelle ~
-
- Hi Michelle - Have you heard of 'SOHCAHTOA' ?
- Draw a right triangle with right angle at the lower right;
the angle T at the left;
- the Opposite (vertical) and the Adjacent (base) and the Hypotenuse
(rising diagonal).
-
- It means Sine = Opp / Hyp , Cosine = Adj / Hyp , Tangent
= Opp / Adj .
You might like sin(T) = y / r , cos(T) = x / r , tan(T) = y /
x .
-
- Along with the Pythagorean Theorem x^2 + y^2 = r^2 , you
can figure
out the whole story just by knowing any one side, and one other
angle.
-
- Please visit my (free!) web lessons at www.dansmath.com
for more ; go to the
- Precalculus area and click Trig. There are pictures and even
some animations
- there for you to enjoy / learn from. And write back any time
with further or more
- specific questions.--
Dan the Math Man strikes again
-
-
Calculus Questions
-
-
- Question C1 - Graphs of
Functions and Derivatives [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan: Could you explain
the principles on graphs with
- relation to their derivative?
- Shane
-
- Hi Shane - Happy to 'explane';
thanks for asking.
-
- The derivative of y = f(x) at a point (a, b) is the
slope of the tangent line
to the graph at the point (a, b). This means that b = f(a) and
that the
- graph and the tangent line have the same slope at x = a.
-
- But the graph of the derivative is different; it records
the slope of the graph
at each point, so if the function is increasing, the derivative
is positive, and
if the graph of f(x) is decr, then f '(x) is neg.
-
- I have a picture on my site of a graph, its deriv,
and second deriv. The link is:
- http://home.earthlink.net/matica.html
; go to the 'options for graphics' section.
- You've inspired me to make a movie of a moving tangent line
along a curve
y = f(x), and a second curve recording the slope f '(x) as it
goes along.
-
- Hope this helps a little; try graphing a few pairs {function
, derivative}
on your graphing calculator, like {y = x^2 , y = 2x} to see the
relation. -Dan
-
-
- Miscellaneous Questions
-
Question M1 - "Profit
Curve" [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan, Can you tell
me how to start and understand how to solve
- (simple) economicproblems
using curves and diagrams? If the volume
- goes up, I realize the
price goes down, but how
do I state these
- circumstances on a graph?
--Failed Economics
-
- Dear Econ -- I'll answer you
with an example.
-
- Let's call the volume or quantity 'q' and the unit
price 'p', where p is a function of q.
- p = f(q) in function notation.
- The revenue R is how much money you take in; R
= p * q = (price per item) * (number
of items).
-
- Fixed Cost: For example if I sell q of my Dan's
MathClinic CD's, and the price is $50 each,
- then p = 50 and the revenue is R = pq
= 50q.
- This makes a simple revenue curve (in blue in fig.1).
- If my costs C(q) are 300 + 10q (see red curve
in fig.1;
$300 for the CD writer and $10 each in costs per CD),
- then my profit P(q) = R(q) -
C(q) = revenue minus
cost (see dotted
line).
-
-
- Here P(q) = 50q - (300 + 10q) = 40q - 300. Thus if 40q -
300 > 0 , I make a profit.
- Solving, 40q > 300 ; q > 300/40 = 7.5 ; I'd need to
sell at least 8 CD's to make a profit.
- There's no maximum profit here; the more I sell, the
more I make.
-
- Variable Cost: Like you say, Econ, normally the price
goes down as q goes up.
- Let's say I lower my price by $2 each (for all the CD's),
each 10 CD's I sell.
- This means if I sell 10, they're $48 each, sell 20, they're$46
each...
- Now p = f(q) = 50 - (2/10)q = 50 - q/5. Then R = pq = (50
- q/5)*q = 50q - (q^2)/5.
- This graph is shown in fig.2. This revenue curve has a max
at q = 125, p = $25,
- R = ($25)(125) = $3125 = max revenue.
- If we work in the cost C(q) = 300 + 10q, the profit will
be
- P(q) = (50q - (q^2)/5) - (300 + 10q) = - (q^2)/5 + 40q -
300.
- The max profit is where the revenue curve and the cost curve
are farthest apart,
- which is at q = 100 ; P(100) = R(100) - C(100) = 3000 - 1300
= $1700 max profit.
-
- Another thing is that the slopes of the curves are equal
at the max profit point;
- that slope is called the "marginal"; the marginal
revenue varies, while the
- marginal cost is always $10. This is usually called MR =
MC (curves are parallel).
-
- What price maximizes revenue? If q = 125 then
p = 50 - q/5 = $25;
- while with a $10 unit cost, if q = 100, then max profit
is p = 50 - 20 = $30. -- Dan
-
-
- Question M2 - Too Big
for my Calculator! [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan, wrote an AOL member,
Help me on this:
- "Evaluate 514^623
to 5 significant digits. Use scientific notation.
- Show work." I tried
this but my calculator overflowed.
-
- Dear Digits,
-
- After you clean up your soggy calculator, you can use logarithms
(logs) to solve your dilemma.
- The "inverse function" principle says that 10^(log(n))
= n , where log(n) = log base 10 of n.
- For example log(100) = 2 because 10^2 = 100 , so 10^(log(100))
= 10^2 = 100.
-
- This means that your base 514 = 10^(log(514)).
- Thus 514^623 = (10^(log(514))^623 = 10 ^ (log(514) * 623)
,
- by the exponent law (a^m)^n = a ^ (mn).
-
- Therefore since log(514) = 2.710963119 (plenty good for 5
sig figs), we get
- 514^623 = 10 ^ (2.710963119 * 623)
- = 10 ^ 1688.930023
- = 10^0.930023 * 10^1688
- = 8.5118337 * 10^1688
- = 8.5118 * 10^1688 , rounded to 5 sig figs.
-
- This means 514^623 = 851,183,...,..., ,,, ,544. (It has 1689
digits.)
- I worked out the last 3 digits for you as a bonus, keeping
just the last
- three digits as I raised (514^7)^89 = (...504)^89 etc.
-
- Happy mathing! -- Dan the Man -- %;-}
-
- P.S. In case you want the whole number,
I put it into Mathematica:
-
- 514^623 =
- 8511833779452615656486074261588685321885848269727007926473787021726299150613454731118227788880566249
- 9579341888420948898108481304117665427347156460108301497273089253879842812864182743351005163472035436
- 9091698147158225289509378576257427198682776595751872026868258927180938200163803994427647392715183966
- 8438066177414163107908914764766832312856288614285766846216688067422913987245591809525756132033707727
- 3261381164233095129638631892480829669588620858837489833863435391375254264716570918878595804922844974
- 2310418481180889249912455348674673062108084846174355138107409273786376749378544392942724724802378363
- 6951658353324022475138456232761933645669704603048983352602514049705723158039218408255041542765534406
- 4868815917217198525065278490345695277562166592816967071940449517006873597453967132291299704130560450
- 5723279949674682963922922526606392473508756303281655716042245944851970688413823936680306848990052843
- 4172747125372607254400181641278574025661557833730883587376180848061056695516518084197482071334661602
- 9788779118737691122722049733546225166341998238481750889164581840259239162814525821884767794193810740
- 1944924038500661882235340706891647456413345490150061465554646972653249409508235179697455196265802208
- 1857783642375526377369578939516800481364204375582244936236988756677536432530501400853958311462717242
- 5921231278348064084321169911247088080501465108150050001777239037687892455271721936588067472562372013
- 9226797016031858987695906723992518615071128448123951828909483023185215617848926913001735240233431571
- 8047094403631130175011120909154066915853750235015414384029541658961970066661248857253769694559849148
- 49683683205294629570227145647934661584612656822106000776999057985958189406303177926508544.
-
-
-
- Question M3 - Scarecrow
was not a Wizard! [
top of page ]
- Adam, a student of mine, wrote:
Hi Dan,
- I don't know if you've seen the
movie The Wizard of OZ, but at the end of
- the movie
when the Scarecrow receives the info that he's already had a
brain,
- he says
this, "The sum of the square
roots of any two sides of an isosceles
- triangle is equal to the square
root of the remaining side. Oh joy, rapture!
- I've got a brain!" But this is only true when you have the two
sides and are
- finding the hypotenuse. If you have
the hypotenuse and are finding one of
- the other legs then you subtract,
so..if the writer of The Wizard of OZ knew
- anything about math he woulda said,"The sum of the square roots of the two
- legs not including the hypttenuse
an isosceles triangle is equal to the square
- root of the remaining side. Oh joy,
rapture! I've got a brain!"
I guess he
- really didn't get a brain after
all. Hehe... Adam
-
- Hey, Adam. Thanks for the reference. Yes I 've seen
that scene many times, and it always
- bugged me, not because of any subtraction you might need
to do, but because of the incorrect
- use of the word "isosceles," which isn't "right."
But you're right, he shouldn't have said "any
- two sides." But he also should have said "square"
of the sides, not "square root. --
Dan
-
- P.S. I sent this into the "Internet
Movie Database Bloopers page."
- Ok, what about an "isosceles right
triangle"? Are there any? Are there any with all three sides
- integers? (Pythag. triple) Anything
close, within 1 degree? Think about these, ok?
- Also, you can
look up the real Pythagorean
Theorem on my Trigonometry page.
-
-
- Question M4 - Good Grapefruit
Prediction [
top of page ]
- Dear Dan - Have a question,
if you can help me.
- It is estimated that 75%
of the grapefruit crop is good, the other
- 25% have rotten centers
which cannot be detected unless the
- grapefruit are cut open.
The grapefruit are sold in sacks of l0.
- If you buy one sack, what
is the probability that your sack will
- contain at least 9 good
grapefruit? What is the average number
- of good grapefruit per
sack? - Thanks; Wolfe
-
- Hi Wolfe - Thanks for writing.
- This is a question about 'binomial probability', meaning
there's a repeated experiment
- with probability p, like n repeated coin flips with p = 0.5.
Here the experiment is
- 'choosing a grapefruit', and the probability of success is
p = 0.75, with q = 1 - p = 0.25.
-
- The average number of
'good' grapefruits in a bag of n = 10 would be m = np = 10(0.75)
- = 7.5 good ones per bag
(75%). There'll never be 7.5 good fruits but that's the average
in
- the long run.
-
- The number of ways of '9 fruits being good' is 10: any of
the 1st thru 10th g-fruit could
- be the bad one. And the prob of each case happening is p^9
* q^1 because there are 9
- good fruits and 1 bad. So we have P9 = (prob of 9 good) =
(10) * (0.75^9) * (0.25^1);
P9 = 10 * 0.07509 * 0.25 = 0.1877, or about an 18.8% chance.
-
- The chance that all 10 are good is P10 = 1 * (0.75^10) *
(0.25^0) = 0.0563. This must
- be added to the previous number: 0.1877 + 0.0563 = 0.2440
, or about 24.4%.
-
- There are also tables that can give you this value directly.
look for 'binomial probability
- tables' in the back of your book. Hope this helps! -- Dan the Stat Man
-
-
- Question M5 - The Speed
Of Dark [
top of page ]
- Geoff wonders, from home.com, Which is faster, light or dark?
Suppose you are carrying a lighted flashlight in a dark forest
on a
- moonless night. You suddenly
turn off your flashlight. The entire
- forest becomes instantly
dark. You now turn the flashlight on but
- the entire forest does
not become instantly light. The speed of dark
- must exceed the speed
of light; it fills the space faster than light.
- Hey Geoff - Interesting question / claim! I remember when I was a kid
I loved the young Muhammad Ali, who boasted he'd dazzle his boxing
opponents.
- "Float like a butterfly, sting
like a bee. I'm so fast, when I get home at night and
- turn out the light, I'm in the bed
before the room gets dark!"
-
- I think you and Ali are both mistaken,
but he's closer. When you turn out the light,
- the last light rays still go at the
speed of light, so things are still being lighted until
- those rays reach their target. So light
and dark have the same speed. As for Ali, he
- can't reach the bed in less than 20
nanoseconds, which is how long it would take
- light to go 20 feet from his high ceiling
to his bed. (That's 20
billionths of a second!)
- -- Dan the Math Man - www.dansmath.com
-
-
-
- [ top of page | go
to 'ask dan' page ]
-
- [ home
| info | meet
dan | ask dan | matica
| prob of week | lessons | dvc
]
-

-
- This site maintained by B
& L Web Design, a division of B & L Math Enterprises